eiPageFolioMySandbox

Friday, July 30, 2010

3.1_FoundationsTheory

The primary conception of the work of an architect is that we draw. An architect who conceives a spatial and experiential environment in her head ultimately illustrates that internal vision as an externalized proposal. A two-dimensional drawing is a proposal's most ubiquitous manifestation. Until recently, the idea taught to architecture students was that those who illustrated ideas provocatively would be rewarded with architectural commissions. The most interesting exemplar of this ideal was the architectural competition.

The development of building information modeling (i.e. BIM) combined with ray-tracing visualization may have shifted the political dynamic of contemporary architectural practice.

The tools of the architect have largely remained the same over the history of the profession (Ortenberg 2010.) Significant technological changes in computer modeling have prompted contemporary architects to place less emphasis on drawing well (i.e. by hand) and to make more investment in technology.

The author believes that this resulted in an unnecessary (i.e. historically inconsistent) schism that has detrimentally stratified design processes, particularly with architectural students. Formal student designs inside the studio often seem a consequent of the BIM parametric, rather than a considered response of deliberate formal or experiential intention. Visionary practioners in the field of architectural illustration (e.g. Leggitt & ?) have proposed a balance between traditional hand drawing and digital imaging that has rendered artificial the stratification between design and drawing. The "tradigital" methods offer processes that move architects away from the ironic interpretation of the term "design drawing" toward the more sustainable vision of drawing as a means to design (i.e. Lockard 1977.)

Several practitioners have seemingly concluded that in order to illustrate designs effectively to clients firms should use computer-modeling technologies. Principals, project managers and project architects have often yielded illustration activities to a younger-generation designer who was educated in the time-intensive data-input skills (e.g. interns and recent graduates.) Architectural illustration has increasingly become the domain of outside subcontractors and in-house entry-level employees. One consequence of this disconnect between illustration and a firm's design leadership is a diminished perception of the significance of architectural illustration. Suppose that architects viewed models as only "one" step in a design process.

Tuesday, May 4, 2010

Download your pdf files from Blogspot

Here was an obvious problem, not readily discovered on the web. Let's say that you want to use Google Docs to share content (i.e. a really great Acrobat pdf file of your project.) No problem, except that when you use the share link clients are directed to the Google Docs viewer -- potentially confusing. The expected experience is that the client clicks on a link and one of either two things happens: the file is downloaded to the local computer; and/or in the case of a pdf, it could open automatically in Acrobat Reader. I dare you to try and find that solution by doing a Google search. Here it is step-by-step:
  1. Do that Google Docs upload thing and "share" the document.
  2. Copy the link and paste it into some kind of simple text program (i.e. TextWrangler.)
  3. Replace the term fileview? to instead read export?format=pdf&.
  4. Therefore the "corrected" link should read as follows:

This solution is relevant to ongoing work on an open source electronic portfolio. Here is an abstract for a paper scheduled to be presented at the 2010 DCA Conference.

Friday, April 23, 2010

750 words & the Field Paradigm

The work that follows is an integration of two concepts, the Field Paradigm discussed in an earlier post, and the web site known as 750Words
This is a draft for tomorrow's post:
Today is Fri, 23 Apr 2010
Welcome Eric Inglert!
Copy and paste the following story synopsis into your blog post.
Expand your story by editing your post and filling in the spaces between your story points.
Story: 750 Words
Setup: The author is green. He is sitting across the table from his book agent, who is much younger, and much more, and all of that . . . and who does not seem possessed of pathos. The meal is long past and so is the deadline for the author's manuscript. The author is as conflicted about how to end the evening's meeting as he is about ending the manuscript.
Plot point 1: Stepping into his apartment alone, again, and tripping in the dark over "her" cat, again . . . he picks himself up. Listening to the answering machine over the persistent meows and the sound of mixing wet cat food into the dry mix -- just the way her cat likes it . . . suddenly, he freezes . . . "Oh, damn I got the answering machine again . . . sorry Dr. Jones, this is Patty from school. I don't know how to say this but I have been trying to reach you. The board voted tonight to eliminate your program. The dean wants a meeting with you tomorrow at 8:00 to discuss how you are going to inform the rest of the faculty. I'm sorry to have to tell you this on the phone, but even the tenured faculty are being let go. Please call me as soon as you get home." He calmly lays down the cat bowl, makes an about face toward the kitchen sink and vomits. Her cat smirks in an uncannily familiar way
Confrontation: The two week extension was too hard fought for to give up on now. Yet, no new ideas present. The author spends all his hours reading other's works. He is searching, not just for a way to make meaningful his work, but so too make vital again his life. Since his tenured position was so deftly administered out of existence -- eerily reminiscent of how her lawyers last year cut him out of his marriage to that woman -- he feels the only way out is to finish the manuscript. At his last interview, he was asked for an advanced reader's copy of his manuscript -- so that the committee could make its final decision. He could finish the year on a high with a great new academic position, better than before, in a great new place in the Pacific Northwest -- or, he could not miss the chance and rot in this apartment. So much is riding on just finishing the damned thing!
Plot point 2: The author is in his office. Several colleagues have popped into the doorway, making it impossible to continue cleaning out his files, let alone keep his eyes dry of memories. The manila file folder stacked on top of the cabinet falls to the ground spraying the contents across the floor. Bending down in a grunt of expletives, the author sees the printouts from the journaling grant project he did with students a couple of years back. What a great creative time that was, and how he was going to miss the classroom . . . and then the Eureka moment. His current manuscript was started back in those heady, fertile days. And, all that work was online in the "cloud." Dropping down on the floor amidst the prints from the blog he begins to read . . . not stopping until the janitor opens the door next morning. He runs out of the office, no closer to moving out, but he is much closer to moving on.
Resolution: The author stares at the computer reading through his archive of journal entries. His face brightens as the kernel of an idea long ago husked away opens before his gaze. He highlights the germ, copies it to his memory and plants it lovingly into the final draft. The manuscript is done. He leans back relieved as the printer churns out the pages for him to read.

Monday, March 15, 2010

Field Paradigm

Wouldn't it be useful to have a tool that used the Field Paradigm to structure thoughts on the electronic portfolio. The prior post started to sketch out what that might look like. Today I wrote a quick form template that outlines the five steps: Ending, Beginning, Conflict, Plot point 1 and Plot point 2. The functional part of the program then restructures it. The user need only copy and paste the restructured "story" skeleton in the blog and fill in the gaps.

Here is the link to the form: fieldParadigm.html

Thursday, February 18, 2010

My Play

Earliest storied memory

WriteStory
PickFriend
CompileArchive
|
|
|
storyForm

storyForm

FindStructure
Find Alternatives
|
|
|
YouTubeIraGlass1
Olson20092
Field20053

Endnotes:

  1. Kentjl's channel. 2006. Ira Glass on Storytelling #1. Accessed 21 Feb 2010. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n7KQ4vkiNUk.
  2. Olson, R. (2009). Don't be such a scientist :Talking substance in an age of style. Washington, DC: Island Press.
  3. Field, S. (2005). Screenplay :The foundations of screenwriting (Rev ed.). New York, N.Y.: Delta Trade Paperbacks.

Followers